2009/3/25 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Some PostgreSQL mailing lists, including the one you are reading now, are
>> proposed to be retired, because they receive very little or mostly off-topic
>> * pgsql-interfaces
>> Many PostgreSQL interfaces have their own mailing lists. Posts that don't fit
>> anywhere else could go to pgsql-general.
> We consider that enough time for objections has passed with no
> objections being raised, so this list is going to be deleted Real Soon
> Now. You Have Been Warned.
I find it amusing that "low traffic" implies some level of
irrelevancy. What a load of tosh. This list has a purpose, it
*serves* that purpose, and does so well. By removing this and
consolidating it with another similarly-related one, you're just going
to contaminate that other list.
-- Thomas Adam
In response to
pgsql-interfaces by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-03-26 01:23:06|
|Subject: Re: this mailing list is proposed to be retired |
|Previous:||From: Andrew McNamara||Date: 2009-03-25 23:32:22|
|Subject: Re: this mailing list is proposed to be retired|