Re: explain and PARAM_EXEC

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: explain and PARAM_EXEC
Date: 2010-04-01 16:28:56
Message-ID: 18032.1270139336@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
> <html>
> <head>
> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
> </head>
> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
> Tom Lane wrote:
> <br>
> <blockquote cite="mid:4BA361F2(dot)5010509(at)gmail(dot)com" type="cite">
> <blockquote type="cite">In principle it could look something like

[ etc etc ]

Please do not send HTML-only email to the lists. It's a PITA to work with.

Anyway, I hadn't looked at your patch before, but now that I have, it's
not even approximately what I was suggesting. What I thought you should
do was change ruleutils.c to print the parameter expressions at the call
site, ie in the T_SubPlan and T_AlternativeSubPlan cases in get_rule_expr.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2010-04-01 16:44:16 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 9.1 - Release Theme
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-04-01 16:14:35 Re: I am interested in the MERGE command implementation as my gSoC project