| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Brad T(dot) Sliger" <brad(at)sliger(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>, Roger Leigh <rleigh(at)codelibre(dot)net>, Roger Leigh <rleigh(at)debian(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output |
| Date: | 2009-09-29 22:42:15 |
| Message-ID: | 18026.1254264135@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Robert Haas escribi:
>> This seems to mean that we can't apply this patch, since failing the
>> regression tests is not an acceptable behavior.
> Does the patch pass regression tests in normal conditions?
If you consider that "normal" means "LANG=C in environment", then yeah.
Else not so much. In particular, every one of the buildfarm machines
that tests a non-C locale environment can be expected to go red.
I think that the required patch might not be a whole lot larger than the
one Brad already submitted, so I'm willing to allow a couple more days
for the author to investigate the issue.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-09-29 22:45:34 | Re: Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-09-29 22:33:43 | Re: Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output |