On Thu, July 29, 2010 22:43, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> In xfunc.sgml, I came across a function example (for use of VARIADIC in polymorphic functions),
> where the function name is concat():  (in the manual: 35.4.10. Polymorphic SQL Functions).
> Although that is not strictly wrong, it seems better to change that name when concat goes into
> core, as seems to be the plan.
>
> If you agree, it seems best to include this change in your patch and change that example
> function's name when the stringfunc patch gets applied.
>

My apologies, the previous email had the wrong doc-patch attached.

Here is the correct one.


Erik Rijkers

In response to

• Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions at 2010-07-29 20:43:57 from Erik Rijkers

Responses

• Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions ( correct patch attached ) at 2010-07-30 09:56:53 from Pavel Stehule
• Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions ( correct patch attached ) at 2011-02-17 17:37:31 from Bruce Momjian

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2010-07-29 20:51:22
	Subject: Re: merge command - GSoC progress
Previous:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2010-07-29 20:45:03
	Subject: Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1