| From: | "Erik Rijkers" <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions ( correct patch attached ) |
| Date: | 2010-07-29 20:49:27 |
| Message-ID: | 179b1edefaf48e9327264d2671e4015b.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, July 29, 2010 22:43, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> In xfunc.sgml, I came across a function example (for use of VARIADIC in polymorphic functions),
> where the function name is concat(): (in the manual: 35.4.10. Polymorphic SQL Functions).
> Although that is not strictly wrong, it seems better to change that name when concat goes into
> core, as seems to be the plan.
>
> If you agree, it seems best to include this change in your patch and change that example
> function's name when the stringfunc patch gets applied.
>
My apologies, the previous email had the wrong doc-patch attached.
Here is the correct one.
Erik Rijkers
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| xfunc.sgml.diff | application/octet-stream | 496 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-07-29 20:51:22 | Re: merge command - GSoC progress |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-07-29 20:45:03 | Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 |