Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions ( correct patch attached )

From: "Erik Rijkers" <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions ( correct patch attached )
Date: 2010-07-29 20:49:27
Message-ID: 179b1edefaf48e9327264d2671e4015b.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, July 29, 2010 22:43, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> In xfunc.sgml, I came across a function example (for use of VARIADIC in polymorphic functions),
> where the function name is concat():  (in the manual: 35.4.10. Polymorphic SQL Functions).
> Although that is not strictly wrong, it seems better to change that name when concat goes into
> core, as seems to be the plan.
>
> If you agree, it seems best to include this change in your patch and change that example
> function's name when the stringfunc patch gets applied.
>

My apologies, the previous email had the wrong doc-patch attached.

Here is the correct one.


Erik Rijkers

Attachment: xfunc.sgml.diff
Description: application/octet-stream (496 bytes)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-07-29 20:51:22
Subject: Re: merge command - GSoC progress
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-07-29 20:45:03
Subject: Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group