Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Date: 2005-12-28 17:13:08
Message-ID: 17999.1135789988@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> It should certainly be fixed, but surely at best this would only delay
> seeing the ugly locale effect - as soon as you call a perl function you'll
> be back in the same boat regardless.

Right, I was not suggesting that fixing the validator would avoid the
bug.  It just surprised me that libperl was getting called in the
restore-a-dump scenario.

BTW, I was just about to go change the validator, but if you want to
do it go ahead...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2005-12-28 17:23:59
Subject: Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Previous:From: Dmitry PanovDate: 2005-12-28 17:11:44
Subject: Re: WAL logs multiplexing?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group