Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Aliased table names ...oddity?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
Cc: Steve Tucknott <steve(at)retsol(dot)co(dot)uk>,PostgreSQL Novice <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Aliased table names ...oddity?
Date: 2005-06-30 13:16:40
Message-ID: 17989.1120137400@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice
Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com> writes:
> Yes, there is/was designed behavior, and there is a way to shut it  
> off in postgresql.conf. It's still there for backwards compatibility,  
> but more recent versions display a notice when a FROM clause is added.

BTW, as of 8.1 add_missing_from will be OFF in the default
configuration.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: Walker, Jed SDate: 2005-06-30 15:18:26
Subject: Using schemas and groups for permissions
Previous:From: Obe, Regina DND\MISDate: 2005-06-30 12:08:55
Subject: Re: Aliased table names ...oddity?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group