Re: Aliased table names ...oddity?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
Cc: Steve Tucknott <steve(at)retsol(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL Novice <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Aliased table names ...oddity?
Date: 2005-06-30 13:16:40
Message-ID: 17989.1120137400@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com> writes:
> Yes, there is/was designed behavior, and there is a way to shut it
> off in postgresql.conf. It's still there for backwards compatibility,
> but more recent versions display a notice when a FROM clause is added.

BTW, as of 8.1 add_missing_from will be OFF in the default
configuration.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Walker, Jed S 2005-06-30 15:18:26 Using schemas and groups for permissions
Previous Message Obe, Regina DND\MIS 2005-06-30 12:08:55 Re: Aliased table names ...oddity?