Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Asko Oja <ascoja(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Date: 2008-07-29 01:31:44
Message-ID: 1793.1217295104@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> To upgrade from citext, I expect  
> that what one will have to do is to alter the column to change its  
> data type from citext to TEXT + collation.

What I'm wondering is how closely that will match the semantics of the
contrib module ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert LorDate: 2008-07-29 05:23:41
Subject: Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2008-07-29 01:24:51
Subject: Re: window function v03 against HEAD

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group