Re: Fwd: 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org, nico(at)def2shoot(dot)com, "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, "Edgars Diebelis" <edgars(dot)diebelis(at)divi(dot)lv>
Subject: Re: Fwd: 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!
Date: 2004-12-29 21:38:09
Message-ID: 17867.1104356289@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32

> "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
>> Tom - what's next? Do we want to roll RC3 with this ugly fix, or do we
>> want to look at a better fix right away?

> I think we want to look at a better fix right away; mainly because we
> need to test it to be sure that it really fixes the problem ;-).
> I will work on this today.

I have committed fixes that rearrange the code as I was envisioning.
Things still seem to work when building with -DEXEC_BACKEND on Unix,
but I'm not in a position to verify the Windows-specific code. Please
give it a try ASAP.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2004-12-30 21:26:09 Re: Fwd: 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-12-29 17:00:32 Re: Fwd: 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!