Re: What's the XID?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What's the XID?
Date: 2007-12-27 17:55:24
Message-ID: 17845.1198778124@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
>> But note that as of 8.3, SELECT-only transactions won't acquire an
>> XID and hence won't advance the counter. So if you're thinking of
>> writing code that depends on that behavior, don't.

> So, the new XID counter won't advance unless there's at least one
> INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE in the transaction? Does it also update for SELECTs that
> call a function which does some write activity?

Any "write" activity causes an XID to be acquired.

> Is there a new counter (or old one that I don't know about) that keeps track
> of the SELECT-only transactions?

There's no global counter. There's a backend-local "virtual transaction
id" counter.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Benjamin Krajmalnik 2007-12-27 19:28:21 Re: [TLM] Trojan in distribution 8.2.5
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2007-12-27 17:31:25 Re: high-availability on MS Windows cluster -- need insights