Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] BUG #3799: csvlog skips some logs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: depesz <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] BUG #3799: csvlog skips some logs
Date: 2007-12-06 18:18:51
Message-ID: 17844.1196965131@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I can't see any very good reason for text logs to have different 
> content from CSV logs.

Well, if we want to cram all that stuff in there, how shall we do it?
It seems wrong to put all those lines into one text field, but I'm
not sure I want to add six more text fields to the CSV format
either.  Thoughts?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-12-06 18:22:19
Subject: Re: pg_dump and BINARY mode COPY
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2007-12-06 18:08:43
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] BUG #3799: csvlog skips some logs

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2007-12-06 21:02:21
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] BUG #3799: csvlog skips some logs
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2007-12-06 18:08:43
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] BUG #3799: csvlog skips some logs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group