Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation
Date: 2008-11-24 14:14:43
Message-ID: 17842.1227536083@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> No, there is no need to clutter every installation in the world with such a
>> database. You could make it an addon module, or a pgfoundry project.

> That would defeat the point.

By that logic, we should install the sample stuff in template1, to
ensure that the examples would "just work" wherever $newbie tries
to execute them :-(

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sam Mason 2008-11-24 14:19:03 Re: literal limits in 8.3
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-11-24 14:14:17 Re: SQL/MED compatible connection manager