| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 |
| Date: | 2006-06-29 22:01:08 |
| Message-ID: | 17831.1151618468@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> writes:
> I think it'd be good to put a big, fat WARNING in the log if we fire up
> an autovac to avoid an XID wrap, since it's an indication that the
> vacuuming scheme that's in place probably isn't good enough.
No, for nonconnectable databases it'd be expected behavior (given the
proposed patch). Warn away if the db is connectable, though ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc Munro | 2006-06-29 22:06:16 | Re: Index corruption |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2006-06-29 21:37:53 | Re: Index corruption |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-29 23:34:55 | Re: [HACKERS] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-06-29 21:37:41 | Re: [HACKERS] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 |