Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] Still big problems with pg_dump!

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Wim <wdh(at)belbone(dot)be>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>,pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Still big problems with pg_dump!
Date: 2002-09-18 15:06:10
Message-ID: 17830.1032361570@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-adminpgsql-generalpgsql-hackerspgsql-novice
Wim <wdh(at)belbone(dot)be> writes:
>> Hm.  Are you running in a multibyte character encoding?  I had a note
>> that make_greater_string may have problems in the MULTIBYTE case.

> Yes, I compiled postgres with multibyte and ODBC support .

But are you actually *using* the multibyte code?  What does "psql -l"
show as the encoding for your database?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: Sean ChittendenDate: 2002-09-18 18:31:44
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Postgres storing time in strange manner
Previous:From: WimDate: 2002-09-18 15:00:33
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Still big problems with pg_dump!

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Rod TaylorDate: 2002-09-18 15:11:00
Subject: Re: Backend crash (long)
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-09-18 15:03:37
Subject: Re: Backend crash (long)

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Laurette CisnerosDate: 2002-09-18 20:09:07
Subject: index performance question
Previous:From: WimDate: 2002-09-18 15:00:33
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Still big problems with pg_dump!

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Stephane BortzmeyerDate: 2002-09-18 15:10:58
Subject: IPv6 type: a proposed implementation
Previous:From: WimDate: 2002-09-18 15:00:33
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Still big problems with pg_dump!

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group