| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL jdbc list <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [HACKERS] Outstanding patches |
| Date: | 2001-05-10 15:07:22 |
| Message-ID: | 17826.989507242@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Has the patch that makes MOVE return number of rows actually moved
>> (analoguous to UPDATE and DELETE) been properly submitted to patches ?
> I know MOVE had fixes in 7.1. I don't know of any outstanding MOVE
> bugs.
It wasn't a bug, it was a feature ;-)
Bruce did not have that patch on his list of things-to-apply, so either
it was never properly submitted or it slipped through the cracks.
Anyone want to dig it up and verify it against 7.1?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2001-05-10 15:41:43 | Re: AW: Coping with huge deferred-trigger lists |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-05-10 14:59:10 | Re: What happened to function textpos()? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-05-10 16:12:46 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] Outstanding patches |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2001-05-10 14:14:28 | Re: [HACKERS] Outstanding patches |