I wrote:
> I therefore propose the following idea: if the database encoding is
> UTF8, allow the regc_locale.c functions to call the <wctype.h>
> functions, assuming that wchar_t and pg_wchar_t share the same
> representation.  On platforms where wchar_t is only 16 bits, we can do
> this up to U+FFFF and be stupid about code points above that.

Or to be concrete, how about the attached?  It seems to do what's
wanted, but I'm hardly the best-qualified person to test it.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• A thought about regex versus multibyte character sets at 2009-11-30 18:15:06 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Greg Smith	Date: 2009-12-01 03:16:23
	Subject: Re: CommitFest status/management
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2009-12-01 02:36:31
	Subject: Re: ProcessUtility_hook