Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Getting rid of AtEOXact_Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: [PERFORM] First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Getting rid of AtEOXact_Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: [PERFORM] First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...)
Date: 2004-10-16 21:19:11
Message-ID: 178.1097961551@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> This does not show in the OSDL results, which I presume means that their
>> test case is not exercising transaction aborts;

> In the test, one out of every 100 new order transactions is aborted (about 1 
> out of 150 transactions overall).

Okay, but that just ensures that any bottlenecks in xact abort will be
down in the noise in this test case ...

In any case, those changes are in CVS now if you want to try them.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-10-16 21:36:45
Subject: Re: Getting rid of AtEOXact_Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: [PERFORM] First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...)
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-10-16 21:18:26
Subject: Re: Getting rid of AtEOXact_Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: [PERFORM] First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...)

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2004-10-16 21:32:14
Subject: Re: Nearing final release?
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-10-16 21:18:26
Subject: Re: Getting rid of AtEOXact_Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: [PERFORM] First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group