Re: PlPython

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: elein(at)varlena(dot)com
Cc: Kevin Jacobs <jacobs(at)penguin(dot)theopalgroup(dot)com>, joconnor(at)cybermesa(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PlPython
Date: 2003-06-30 21:32:18
Message-ID: 17718.1057008738@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com> writes:
> Sorry about the mixup earlier. But the "forbidden"
> modules part still needs to be tossed for the new doc.

Right. I already pulled section 43.4 --- see the updated docs at
http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/plpython.html

I've also commented out the paragraph about global data and function
arguments pending resolution of the question. Given the reference to
restricted execution objects in the original text, I would think that
the removal of rexec usage means that plpython functions can now get at
any global data. But I'm not a Python user and might be
misunderstanding the point.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Jacobs 2003-06-30 21:36:36 Re: PlPython
Previous Message elein 2003-06-30 21:14:09 Re: PlPython

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Jacobs 2003-06-30 21:36:36 Re: PlPython
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-06-30 21:27:38 Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support