Re: [SQL] Numeric and money

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "mdavis(at)sevainc(dot)com" <mdavis(at)sevainc(dot)com>
Cc: "'pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [SQL] Numeric and money
Date: 2001-01-03 20:36:49
Message-ID: 17683.978554209@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-general pgsql-interfaces pgsql-sql

[ mail lists trimmed to something a tad more reasonable ]

Michael Davis <mdavis(at)sevainc(dot)com> writes:
> From within Access, I can't update any table with a numeric data type
> because of the "select * from tst where amount = 1.1;" failure.

Yeah. The problem here is the conflict between interpreting '1.1' as
a "float8" constant vs. interpreting it as a "numeric" constant. In order
to fix this we need to settle on a better type promotion hierarchy among
the various numeric datatypes. You can find past discussions of the
issue in the pghackers archives. I made a proposal on 13-May-2000 that
I think was objected to by some people, though I don't recall exactly
why.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karel Zak 2001-01-04 07:03:45 Re: Numeric and money
Previous Message Barnes, Sandy (Sandra) 2001-01-03 20:20:29 V7.0 Error: OID ##### no longer exists in pg_database

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-01-03 21:24:43 Re: user privileges for particular table
Previous Message Thomas T. Thai 2001-01-03 20:35:12 user privileges for particular table

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karel Zak 2001-01-04 07:03:45 Re: Numeric and money
Previous Message Cedar Cox 2001-01-03 20:13:14 Re: plpgsql help - nested loops

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Najm Hashmi 2001-01-03 21:05:17 About Index
Previous Message Francis Solomon 2001-01-03 19:00:54 RE: [SQL] Numeric and money