Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SET autocommit begins transaction?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SET autocommit begins transaction?
Date: 2002-09-18 22:08:02
Message-ID: 17607.1032386882@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org> writes:
>>> Does turnning autocommit off enter you into a transaction?  Am I
>>> smoking something or does that seems broken?

> Tom, do you want to special case autocommit?  I think that would be OK.

No, I don't like that either ... in general I do not think SET's
behavior should vary depending on which variable is being set.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Sean ChittendenDate: 2002-09-18 22:11:27
Subject: Re: SET autocommit begins transaction?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-09-18 22:05:58
Subject: Re: SET autocommit begins transaction?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group