| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, magnus(dot)enbom(at)rockstorm(dot)se, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [SQL] LIMIT 1 FOR UPDATE or FOR UPDATE LIMIT 1? |
| Date: | 2002-08-28 04:29:16 |
| Message-ID: | 17588.1030508956@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> OK, patch attached. It was actually easier than I thought. We have to
> decide if we are going to remove the old syntax in 7.4.
I'd say "no". There's no compelling reason to break backward
compatibility here --- certainly a couple more productions in gram.y
isn't enough reason.
But I think it'd be sufficient to document only the new syntax.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-08-28 04:33:26 | Re: fix for palloc() of user-supplied length |
| Previous Message | Serguei Mokhov | 2002-08-28 04:12:26 | Re: fix for palloc() of user-supplied length |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mathieu Arnold | 2002-08-28 06:42:13 | Re: triggers and plpgsql question |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-28 04:14:38 | Re: Calculation Error on Epoch? |