Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: lock listing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>,PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: lock listing
Date: 2002-07-20 03:26:58
Message-ID: 17586.1027135618@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Neil Conway wrote:
>> While we're on the topic, there was talk a couple months ago of removing
>> or asking the authors to relicense the contrib/ modules that are GPL'd
>> (or perhaps LGPL'd). Would this be a good idea? If so, I can do it...

> Yes, Tom was going to address this.

Yeah, it's the sort of thing that I think a core member has to do ...
as the most junior core member, I'm not sure *I'm* the most appropriate
person to do it, but ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2002-07-20 04:42:22
Subject: default attstattarget
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-07-20 02:21:27
Subject: Re: lock listing

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group