Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here
Date: 1998-10-30 04:17:16
Message-ID: 17577.909721036@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> On Sun, 30 Aug 1998, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So I think I have to vote in favor of leaving the socket where it is.

> Let me put my vote in...: $PGSQLHOME/run/{pgsql.pid,pgsql.pid.socket}
> Screw backwards compatibility...v6.5 becomes v7.0 *shrug*

Catching up on back email, Marc?

I think the end consensus of that thread was that we should move the
socket file to someplace safer than /tmp (exactly where being a
configure-time choice), *and* optionally put a softlink to it in /tmp
for backwards compatibility with old clients.  Use of the /tmp link
would be deprecated because of possible security risks, but it could
continue to work for as long as a particular installation needed to
keep that option enabled.

Actually getting it done doesn't seem to have happened :-(.  I think
we were all viewing this as part & parcel of fixing the lockfile issues,
which no one got exercised enough to do.  Too many higher-priority
tasks...

			regards, tom lane

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 1998-10-30 04:17:32
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] v6.4-BETA3 problems with FreeBSD
Previous:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 1998-10-30 04:12:02
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] v6.4-BETA3 problems with FreeBSD

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group