Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature
Date: 2010-05-31 22:16:30
Message-ID: 17555B4B-C6CB-403E-86D3-7EBC2E1CA119@kineticode.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On May 31, 2010, at 8:56 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> I don't have strong feelings about the timing - I'd be very surprised if := were to be used in this context for any other purpose, so I don't think we'd be biting ourselves too much by just using that now. But if we do that, we should deprecate use of => as an operator now, and definitely remove its use in hstore either now or in 9.1.

+1

David


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-05-31 22:23:04
Subject: Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature
Previous:From: Andy BalholmDate: 2010-05-31 21:59:06
Subject: Re: dividing money by money

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group