Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?
Date: 2010-03-02 16:23:18
Message-ID: 17546.1267546998@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Partially. There are stats now but autovacuum is not bright about
>> when to update them.

> Is that something you're planning to fix for 9.0?  If not, we at least
> need to document what we intend for people to do about it.

I want to look at it, but I'm not sure whether the fix will be small
enough that we want to put it in during beta.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-03-02 16:23:22
Subject: Re: GiST index performance
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-03-02 16:21:15
Subject: Re: GiST index performance

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Grzegorz JaśkiewiczDate: 2010-03-02 16:27:14
Subject: Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-03-02 16:21:28
Subject: Re: USE_LIBXSLT in MSVC builds

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group