Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #6565: GEQO documentation discrepancy after 9.0 change?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: gcottenc(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #6565: GEQO documentation discrepancy after 9.0 change?
Date: 2012-04-10 00:51:55
Message-ID: 17532.1334019115@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:36 AM,  <gcottenc(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> """GEQO's searching is randomized and therefore its plans may vary
>> nondeterministically."""
>> 
>> I guess this sentence is outdated now?

> Hmm, sounds like it.  Does anyone think otherwise?

Well, you could still argue that it's nondeterministic, but the
nondeterminism is at least mostly hidden from users.  I've removed
that sentence and adjusted some other places to match.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Amit KapilaDate: 2012-04-10 06:15:25
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #6522: PostgreSQL does not start
Previous:From: Amit KapilaDate: 2012-04-10 00:48:47
Subject: Re: BUG #6534: Passing numeric Bind variables to ODBC driver convers to "Double precision"

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group