Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Do we need a TODO? (was Re: Concurrently updating anupdatable view)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, "Hiroshi Inoue" <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we need a TODO? (was Re: Concurrently updating anupdatable view)
Date: 2007-06-01 18:12:55
Message-ID: 17309.1180721575@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I'm sorry guys but I don't agree this is a TODO item.
...
> Also, methinks we should have agreed behaviour before we make something
> a TODO item.

There is a whole *lot* of stuff in the TODO list that does not have a
consensus solution yet.  You should not imagine that it's gospel.

At the same time, it'd be better if this item were worded more like
"investigate this issue" rather than presupposing a particular
form of answer.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-06-01 18:23:38
Subject: Re: Command tags in create/drop scripts
Previous:From: Florian G. PflugDate: 2007-06-01 18:06:03
Subject: Re: Do we need a TODO? (was Re: Concurrently updating anupdatable view)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group