Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS Patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com>
Cc: Horák Daniel <horak(at)sit(dot)plzen-city(dot)cz>, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS Patch
Date: 2001-01-17 16:19:10
Message-ID: 17221.979748350@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports
Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com> writes:
>> That does not look like a bug;

> My point was that the error message generated by the second postmaster
> is *different* that the one generated for the same test case on a real
> UNIX (i.e., Linux) platform.

It is?  I get exactly that message (modulo the obvious path and PID
differences) when I try it.  Are you comparing to 7.0.* on Linux
perhaps?  IIRC, 7.0 makes these tests in a different order than 7.1
does.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Jason TishlerDate: 2001-01-17 17:07:49
Subject: Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS Patch
Previous:From: Jason TishlerDate: 2001-01-17 16:16:13
Subject: Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS Patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group