Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: planner/optimizer question

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Gary Doades" <gpd(at)gpdnet(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: planner/optimizer question
Date: 2004-04-29 21:54:31
Message-ID: 17175.1083275671@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
"Gary Doades" <gpd(at)gpdnet(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> In this example the statistics don't matter.

Don't they?

A prior poster mentioned that he thought MSSQL tries to keep all its
indexes in memory.  I wonder whether you are giving Postgres a fair
chance to do the same.  What postgresql.conf settings are you using?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-04-29 22:10:08
Subject: Re: Simply join in PostrgeSQL takes too long
Previous:From: Gary DoadesDate: 2004-04-29 21:15:12
Subject: Re: planner/optimizer question

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group