Re: planner/optimizer question

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Gary Doades" <gpd(at)gpdnet(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: planner/optimizer question
Date: 2004-04-29 21:54:31
Message-ID: 17175.1083275671@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

"Gary Doades" <gpd(at)gpdnet(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> In this example the statistics don't matter.

Don't they?

A prior poster mentioned that he thought MSSQL tries to keep all its
indexes in memory. I wonder whether you are giving Postgres a fair
chance to do the same. What postgresql.conf settings are you using?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-04-29 22:10:08 Re: Simply join in PostrgeSQL takes too long
Previous Message Gary Doades 2004-04-29 21:15:12 Re: planner/optimizer question