Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I agree, but in a certain sense, we would have found those compilers
> already. This is not new behavour as far as I know, and clearly this
> would throw a compiler error.
[ Digs around ... ] OK, you're right, it's not new behavior; we have
instances of similarly-split comments at least back to REL6_5. I guess
my fears of portability problems are unfounded.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2001-05-23 19:50:09|
|Subject: Re: Not released yet, but could someone take a quick peak ... |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2001-05-23 19:35:21|
|Subject: Re: select ... for update and inheritence |