Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 11:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If you think we're at the point where this item is the main thing
>> standing between us and beta, I'll go do something about it. I've
>> been waiting for the HS code to settle before trying to design a
> I'm not hugely interested in supporting HS in standalone backends.
I'm not either. The type of scenario that I'm worried about is someone
trying to use a standalone backend to clean up after a recovery failure.
Right now I'm afraid that could make things worse (ie create additional
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-04-19 17:24:45|
|Subject: Re: cost_rescan (was: match_unsorted_outer() vs. cost_nestloop()) |
|Previous:||From: Andres Freund||Date: 2010-04-19 16:47:42|
|Subject: Re: idle in txn query cancellation|