Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>,"Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Date: 2005-04-02 06:31:13
Message-ID: 1706.1112423473@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> Also, since plPerlNG is maintained on PgFoundry, are the changes you are 
> making to core getting migrated back to the main project itself?

I don't know, and not being a maintainer of the pgfoundry project,
it is *definitely* not my problem.  But I cannot believe it's a
good idea to have two supposedly authoritative CVS repositories
for the same code...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Qingqing ZhouDate: 2005-04-02 07:19:17
Subject: Re: invalidating cached plans
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-04-02 06:21:21
Subject: Re: Debugging deadlocks

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2005-04-02 07:46:50
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-04-02 06:21:21
Subject: Re: Debugging deadlocks

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group