Wes Palmer <Wesley(dot)R(dot)Palmer(at)syntegra(dot)com> writes:
> Any chance of change that
> behavior to scan in physical storage order?

It wouldn't be easy --- there are some locking considerations that say
btbulkdelete needs to scan the index in the same order that an ordinary
scan would do.  See the nbtree README for details.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: Vacuum time degrading at 2005-03-03 04:46:48 from Wes Palmer

Responses

• Re: Vacuum time degrading at 2005-03-08 15:44:21 from Wes
• Re: Vacuum time degrading at 2005-04-04 15:38:56 from Wes

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2005-03-03 05:20:35
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode
Previous:	From: Wes Palmer	Date: 2005-03-03 04:46:48
	Subject: Re: Vacuum time degrading

pgsql-general by date

Next:	From: jack alex	Date: 2005-03-03 06:44:37
	Subject: does postgres supports syslog-ng package for loging rather than using standart syslog package
Previous:	From: Wes Palmer	Date: 2005-03-03 04:46:48
	Subject: Re: Vacuum time degrading