Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Wiki clarification

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Wiki clarification
Date: 2011-02-26 21:09:43
Message-ID: 1699176efabe70ce11db25610fa49349@biglumber.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


> To clarify what I'm suggesting - I'm suggesting vendors set up a page
> about their own product somewhere on their own site, be it a wiki or
> something else. If they don't have one, on a simple google site or
> even a github wiki.
>
> postgresql.org will then link to this from our product catalogue,
> which is on the website, just like we do for other commercial
> products. That way we (the project) provide equal level of visibility
> for third party software, and it's entirely up to the vendor exactly
> what type of information to keep on the page/wiki.

- -1. Our software catalog is nowhere near as visible as our wiki.

> So basically the same thing, except I think the vendor should keep
> their info and postgresql link to it, rather than the other way
> around.

Not sure why the wiki can't have it as well. It's not like there is a 
limit on the number of pages. Also, would this apply only to 
*commercial* third-party software? Because we have things like this:

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Londiste

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PGXN

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/TurnKey_PostgreSQL

Not to mention things like this:

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Tungsten

In short, I'd like to see more on the wiki, commerical or no, I think we're 
a mature enough community to be able to self-police any blatant commercial 
abuse of the wiki.

- -- 
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201102261607
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAk1pa+wACgkQvJuQZxSWSsgSZQCfc+ePJANSCfnFmTdJGBmgNEqt
1BQAn0xzysnIJfP1K7b3R8gIM66cvLRH
=fcUE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2011-02-26 21:35:12
Subject: Re: Top five challenges
Previous:From: Greg Sabino MullaneDate: 2011-02-26 21:00:10
Subject: Re: RFC: Hosting mailing lists of 3rd party projects

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group