Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #1518: Conversions to (undocumented) SQL year-month and

From: Roy Badami <roy(at)gnomon(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Roy Badami <roy(at)gnomon(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #1518: Conversions to (undocumented) SQL year-month and
Date: 2005-03-23 22:10:30
Message-ID: 16961.59734.409675.896781@giles.gnomon.org.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
    Bruce> Here is an email stating it is implementation defined:

    Bruce> 	http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-03/msg00162.php

Hmm, looks like I'm mistaken, then.  In fact the "whether to truncate
or round" bit suggests you should do one or the other, rather than
raise an exception.

Will have to take a look at the spec when I get a moment...

      -roy


In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-03-23 22:13:40
Subject: Re: BUG #1552: massive performance hit between 7.4 and 8.0.1
Previous:From: Roy BadamiDate: 2005-03-23 22:05:51
Subject: Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group