Paul Caskey <paul(at)nmxs(dot)com> writes:
> But first, has this issue come up in the past, and was a decision made to
> keep sequences simple as an "int4" type only? Please clue me in on the
> history. Is there any reason not to push forward with "int8" sequences,
> as some sort of compile-time or run-time option?
Mainly it's that int8 isn't supported on all our platforms. As a
compile-time option it might be reasonable...
regards, tom lane