| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.5 development schedule |
| Date: | 2009-07-02 02:34:15 |
| Message-ID: | 16880.1246502055@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>>> If we review patches as soon as they appear, and give rapid feedback, we
>>> can easily reject patches that take more than a few days for the patch
>>> author to resolve, and there would be little slippage; the same goes
>>> for dealing with known bugs. I know it can be done, but I don't promise
>>> it would be pleasant.
>>
>> In other words, you propose dropping the idea of commitfests, and
>> expecting committers to spend *all* their time reviewing? Tain't
>> happening.
> "I don't promise it would be pleasant."
I'm not sure which part of "no" you didn't understand, but this
committer is not buying into that proposal.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-07-02 02:36:22 | Re: 8.5 development schedule |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-07-02 02:33:05 | Re: 8.5 development schedule |