Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Fixing pg_dump

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fixing pg_dump
Date: 2004-06-25 04:01:47
Message-ID: 1683.1088136107@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Out of interest - have you developed an opinion on the 
> pg_get_serial_sequence thing?

Will apply as soon as I get a chance --- I'd intended to clean out the
patch queue today, but didn't get past Magnus' stuff.

> Also, what's the latest I can get pg_dump fixes in?

Roughly speaking, sizeof(patch)/time_to_freeze is a constant.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2004-06-25 04:03:57
Subject: Re: Fixing pg_dump
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-06-25 03:55:55
Subject: Re: [Re] Re: PREPARE and transactions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group