Re: New ODBC driver

From: markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New ODBC driver
Date: 2004-12-01 16:20:54
Message-ID: 16814.24.91.171.78.1101918054.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com [mailto:markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com]
>> Sent: 01 December 2004 15:02
>> To: Dave Page
>> Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
>> Subject: Re: [ODBC] New ODBC driver
>>
>> > I don't think it would be realistic to mix the two
>> approaches though -
>> > if only because they couldn't share a single database connection.
>>
>> Why is this an issue? Why not create multiple connections?
>
> Efficiency for a start - but what would you use each for? Any
> application developer is going to expect everything to use the same
> connection - how do you direct a 'SET' statement? What about transaction
> isolation?
>
> Regards, Dave.

OK, I'm going to take a look at it.

I have a stupid question, where is the location of the ODBC source? Is it
part of PostgreSQL?

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2004-12-01 16:27:57 Re: New ODBC driver
Previous Message markw 2004-12-01 15:01:48 Re: New ODBC driver