Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> But, looking at it a bit more carefully, isn't the maximum-size logic
> for numeric rather bogus?
Perhaps, but I think you're confused on at least one point.
numeric(2,1) has to be able to hold 2 decimal digits, not 2
NumericDigits (which'd actually be 8 decimal digits given
the current code).
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2010-07-30 08:07:18|
|Subject: Re: ERROR: argument to pg_get_expr() must come from system catalogs|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-07-30 04:36:26|
|Subject: Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1|