Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Recovery failed on a backup with " lock AccessShareLock on object 16477/244169/0 is already held"

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "John Smith" <sodgodofall(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Recovery failed on a backup with " lock AccessShareLock on object 16477/244169/0 is already held"
Date: 2008-06-30 23:25:54
Message-ID: 16631.1214868354@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
"John Smith" <sodgodofall(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> BTW, what's with the bizarre "Local time zone must be set--see zic
>> manual" where the timezone should be?  Are you intentionally selecting
>> the "Factory" zone?

> I don't think I've put the correct timezone file in /etc/localtime  so
> it is using some default file from the Gentoo install.

Ah, yes, I was able to duplicate that behavior by overwriting
/etc/localtime with /usr/share/zoneinfo/Factory.  I guess the Gentoo
folks failed in their intention to annoy you enough to make you set
the zone correctly ;-)

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-06-30 23:37:29
Subject: Re: psql: FATAL: the database system is starting up
Previous:From: John SmithDate: 2008-06-30 22:35:42
Subject: Re: Recovery failed on a backup with " lock AccessShareLock on object 16477/244169/0 is already held"

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group