Re: Broken link in PG docs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Broken link in PG docs
Date: 2006-09-25 23:09:16
Message-ID: 16547.1159225756@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> I agree the link should be fixed, but I can't see another canonical
> location for the document online: linking to CiteSeer (which itself is
> generated from the mention in our online docs) is probably not wise.

citeseer's cache still has the paper, and in it I find the authors'
email addresses ... could try writing to them ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Seltenreich 2006-09-29 04:32:27 Re: Texinfo docs/target
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-09-25 19:39:07 Re: [HACKERS] Broken link in PG docs

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-25 23:14:24 Re: Windows build farm failures
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2006-09-25 23:08:56 Re: Please to technical check of upcoming release