Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> Attached is a revised patch. Changes:
Looks reasonable to me. Just one comment: should the
-fno-strict-aliasing probe be inside the "if test "$GCC" = yes" part?
It effectively was in the original.
> BTW, since we're on the topic of compiler options, is there a reason we
> don't use -g3 with GCC when --enable-debug is specified? It seems worth
> using to me.
How much does it bloat the executable?
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-10-19 16:16:47|
|Subject: Re: additional GCC warning flags |
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2004-10-19 15:44:05|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] strange result from contrib/seg regression on windows|