| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Theo Schlossnagle <jesus(at)omniti(dot)com>, josh(dot)berkus(at)sun(dot)com, robert(dot)lor(at)sun(dot)com, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64 |
| Date: | 2006-04-27 23:02:06 |
| Message-ID: | 16483.1146178926@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Great, changes attached and applied. I removed the solaris_i386 and
> solaris_x86_64.s files and made just one solaris_x86.s. I updated the
> build system to use the new file, updated the macros, and added some
> documentation on the approach. Thanks.
BTW, on the replacement of ldstub with cas: according to what I find in
google, cas does not exist on pre-V9 SPARCs. Are we sure no one uses
sparc v8 chips anymore? Is there any actual advantage to making that
change?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Theo Schlossnagle | 2006-04-27 23:55:38 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-27 22:47:01 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Theo Schlossnagle | 2006-04-27 23:55:38 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-27 22:47:01 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64 |