Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Hash joins vs small-integer join values

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net>, Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Hash joins vs small-integer join values
Date: 2007-06-01 04:00:55
Message-ID: 16362.1180670455@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Tom,
>> The problem is that this is not a back-patchable
>> answer, because changing the hash functions would corrupt existing hash
>> indexes.  

> Does anyone *use* hash indexes?

We get bug reports on 'em, so yes ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: ITAGAKI TakahiroDate: 2007-06-01 05:07:29
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] like/ilike improvements
Previous:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2007-06-01 03:51:43
Subject: Re: Hash joins vs small-integer join values

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group