Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: tsvector pg_stats seems quite a bit off.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jesper Krogh <jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc>
Cc: Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: tsvector pg_stats seems quite a bit off.
Date: 2010-05-31 18:38:19
Message-ID: 16300.1275331099@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Jesper Krogh <jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc> writes:
> Just a small follow up. I tried out the patch (or actually a fresh git
> checkout) and it now gives very accurate results for both upper and
> lower end of the MCE-histogram with a lower cutoff that doesn't
> approach 2.

Good.  How much did the ANALYZE time change for your table?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-05-31 18:40:02
Subject: Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay
Previous:From: Jesper KroghDate: 2010-05-31 18:12:51
Subject: Re: tsvector pg_stats seems quite a bit off.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group