Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
Date: 2008-01-28 02:04:03
Message-ID: 16296.1201485843@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
[ redirecting thread to -hackers ]

Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 21:54 +0000, Gregory Stark wrote:
>> I liked the "synchronized_sequential_scans" idea myself.

> I think that's a bit too long. How about "synchronized_scans", or
> "synchronized_seqscans"?

We have enable_seqscan already, so that last choice seems to fit in.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Stephen FrostDate: 2008-01-28 02:32:54
Subject: Re: GSSAPI doesn't play nice with non-canonical hostnames
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2008-01-28 01:34:27
Subject: Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Michael GlaesemannDate: 2008-01-28 04:09:57
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2008-01-28 01:34:27
Subject: Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group