Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions
Date: 2010-03-10 07:39:00
Message-ID: 162867791003092339t5c4f1c4bg3e47ca57895d66cf@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2010/3/9 Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> updated version, concat function doesn't use separator
>
> btw...very cool stuff.  I took a brief look at the sprintf
> implementation.  The main switch:
> switch (pdesc.field_type)
>
> It looks like format codes we choose not to support (like %p) are
> silently ignored.  Is this the correct behavior?

it could be enhanced. sprintf is little bit baroque function and I am
not able to take all details. Please, add comment with proposals for
change.

Pavel

>
> merlin
>

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2010-03-10 09:09:57
Subject: walreceiver is uninterruptible on win32
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2010-03-10 06:29:19
Subject: Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group