From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Oleg Serov <serovov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Bug in triggers |
Date: | 2010-03-09 15:31:10 |
Message-ID: | 162867791003090731na77a59amf765cdfee7efa003@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
2010/3/9 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> What seems odd to me is that NEW is apparently some other kind of
>> thing that is not the same kind of thing as the row variable.
>
> NEW is a record variable, not a row variable. In this context that's
> sensible because its actual rowtype is unspecified by the function text.
> The implications for row-null handling aren't obvious though :-(
>
is it necessary definition there? This is defined well from context.
regards
Pavel Stehule
> regards, tom lane
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Travers | 2010-03-09 15:46:16 | Re: Bug in triggers |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-03-09 15:25:53 | Re: Bug in triggers |