2010/2/16 Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>:
> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> The dictionary data could be shared or minimally dictionary could be
>> preloaded like some PL language.
>> What do you think about this?
> Surely preloading is the most realistic approach, but I hope we would support
> dynamic allocation of shared memory, and load dictionaries in the area and
> share it with backends. We should avoid additonal calls of shmget() or mmap()
> in the additional shared memory allocation, but we can shrink shared buffers
> and reuse the area for general purposes. We often have serveral GB of shared
> buffers nowadays, so dividing some MB of buffers will not be problem.
I am for all solution, but using a shared memory isn't realistic now,
and can be a problem on MS Windows. More - it can be difficult with
some special custom non ro dictionaries.
> Takahiro Itagaki
> NTT Open Source Software Center
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: David Fetter||Date: 2010-02-16 08:45:08|
|Previous:||From: Jakub Ouhrabka||Date: 2010-02-16 08:40:28|
|Subject: Re: Problem with 8.4 stats collector high load|