2010/1/25 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> 2010/1/25 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>:
>>> xmlagg -> concatenates values to form xml datum
>>> array_agg -> concatenates values to form array datum
>>> ??? -> concatenates values to form string datum
>>> So it's pretty clear that listagg does not fit into this scheme.
>> when you define list as text domain, then this the name is correct.
> IOW, if you define away the problem then there's no problem?
> I agree that "list" is a terrible choice of name here. "string_agg"
> seemed reasonable and in keeping with the standardized "array_agg".
I am not happy, I thing so we do bigger chaos then it is. But it
hasn't progress. So I agree with name string_agg. In this case isn't a
problem rename this function if somebody would.
I'll send patch over hour.
> regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2010-01-25 14:22:26|
|Subject: Re: Re: pgsql: In HS, Startup process sets SIGALRM when
waiting for buffer pin.|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-01-25 13:57:10|
|Subject: Re: Review: listagg aggregate |